Client stories
Client stories and reviews
Comments from finance leads and administrators who commissioned a financial audit of leasing administration applications with us. Length and tone vary — including where the work was harder than expected.
The residual roll-forward in our equipment application did not match the vendor schedule. Data Query Flow traced the gap to three early terminations that never hit the admin pack. We reissued before credit committee.
We asked for a dossier review only. They still caught a fee summary that used the old stamp-duty figure. Mild frustration on our side that our own checklist missed it — but better before circulation than after.
Reconciliation took longer than the estimate because our invoice archive was incomplete. Once we supplied the missing months, the payment calendar variances were clear enough for counsel.
The findings letter ranked blocking items separately from observations. That split helped our credit chair decide what had to be fixed overnight versus what could wait for the next renewal cycle.
Remediation sessions were practical. We sat with annotated schedules, not slides, and left with corrected residual footnotes ready to paste into the application.
Extended case — mixed fleet renewal pack
A Northern Thailand lessor brought a renewal administration application covering eighty-two light commercial vehicles. Payment schedules had been rebuilt after a rate amendment; residuals still reflected the pre-amendment policy. Our full audit mapped each contract’s residual clause to the roll-forward table and found eleven units still on the old percentage.
The findings letter listed those eleven as blocking. During remediation support, the client’s administrators produced a corrected residual exhibit and an explanation memo for credit. The renewed application moved in the following committee cycle. The work did not extend to a statutory audit of the lessor’s financial statements — only the administration pack under review.